<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed version="0.3" xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xml:lang="en">
<title>Representative Expression</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.yaps4u.net/" />
<modified>2008-04-23T08:37:13Z</modified>
<tagline>a medium of communication or expression for somebody or something,the voice of reason</tagline>
<id>tag:www.yaps4u.net,2008://1</id>
<generator url="http://www.movabletype.org/" version="3.33">Movable Type</generator>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2008, Chris Wright</copyright>
<entry>
<title>Happy St. Georges Day</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.yaps4u.net/mt_archives/2008/04/happy_st_georges_day.html" />
<modified>2008-04-23T08:37:13Z</modified>
<issued>2008-04-23T08:37:09Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.yaps4u.net,2008://1.1175</id>
<created>2008-04-23T08:37:09Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">It&apos;s a sad fact that more people in England celebrate St. Patrick&apos;s Day and even Bonfire Night than they do St Georges Day.&amp;#160; I would also bet, most people don&apos;t even know who St. George was and when speaking to...</summary>
<author>
<name>Chris Wright</name>
<url>http://www.yaps4u.net</url>
<email>blogs@yaps4u.net</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>General</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.yaps4u.net/">
<![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.yaps4u.net/images/HappySt.GeorgesDay_7612/stgeorgeflag01.jpg"><img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px" border="0" alt="The Flag of St George" align="right" src="http://www.yaps4u.net/images/HappySt.GeorgesDay_7612/stgeorgeflag01_thumb.jpg" width="240" height="214" /></a>It's a sad fact that more people in England celebrate St. Patrick's Day and even Bonfire Night than they do St Georges Day.&#160; </p>  <p>I would also bet, most people don't even know who St. George was and when speaking to someone the other day, they didn't even know what a St. George Flag looked like.</p>  <p>So head on over to the <a title="Help Make St. Georges Day and Official English National Holiday" href="http://www.stgeorgesday.com/home">St. Georges Day</a> website and take part in their campaign! </p>  <p>So have a happy St. Georges Day... </p>  <p>God knows what we do to celebrate it though...   <br />So I'm off for a cup of tea, some toasted crumpet and to watch a bit of Morris dancing.    <br />Then I guess it'll be Guinness and a curry tonight (or should it be a kebab).</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Chris Miller: His story, his words...</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.yaps4u.net/mt_archives/2008/04/chris_miller_his_story_his_words.html" />
<modified>2008-04-20T02:36:37Z</modified>
<issued>2008-04-20T02:25:45Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.yaps4u.net,2008://1.1174</id>
<created>2008-04-20T02:25:45Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">A few weeks back now, I made a rather large error in a post I made concerning a guy called Chris Miller and the problems he had with the airline Emirates . Having emailed Chris a few times, I asked...</summary>
<author>
<name>Chris Wright</name>
<url>http://www.yaps4u.net</url>
<email>blogs@yaps4u.net</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>General</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.yaps4u.net/">
<![CDATA[<p>A few weeks back now, I made a rather large error in a post I made concerning a guy called Chris Miller and the problems he had with the airline Emirates .</p>  <p>Having emailed Chris a few times, I asked his permission to re-post his account to which he kindly agreed. </p>  <blockquote>   <p>&quot;Please think about this before you comment on any story published on a newspaper/tv media site:      <br />Firstly can I start by saying that yes I am the person at the centre of the story. We had a perfect right to ask the airline for compensation based on the whole experience which you can see below. You should realise that going to the media will of course have ended any outside chance we had to get any compensation from the airline so we only went to the media because the attitude of Emirates was so appalling that we wanted to publicise how truly bad they were as a warning to other families.</p> </blockquote> ]]>
<![CDATA[  <blockquote>   <p>We could only tell the full story to journalists, we cannot control how they present it and clearly they are putting their own spin on it. That is how the media works. The media like a straightforward story but this was not a straighforward story. Consequently they cherry picked the story we went to them with and presented two parts - one part about the phone call and one part that we had been offered no compensation. The rest of the story was ignored or referred to without detail to produce a clearer story. What you may have read is therefore not the full story and you cannot fully comprehend what happened without understanding the whole picture. </p>    <p>Emirates is a big multi national company that clearly thinks they can just do whatever it wants to its paying customers. We are an ordinary family that was thrust into exceptional events 1000&#8217;s of miles from our home. We merely want people to be aware of what they did. We have no solicitor acting on our behalf, we are dealing with all the media ourselves in an attempt to show how any family could be treated by their incompetent staff. We have both travelled all over the world and used numerous airlines, we have never had cause to make a single complaint in all our years of travel. This was our first Emirates experience. </p>    <p>Just getting the story out to embarrass the airline is the start of us getting closure on all this. </p>    <p>The full facts are as follows: </p>    <p>On arrival at Mumbai after a passenger became ill the airline removed my family from the flight as my son had developed a rash during the flight. They then put the safety of my partner and two young children at risk by driving them around Mumbai in a dangerous, old taxi without seat belts or doors that closed properly in the full sweltering heat of the day with no air conditioning. After 5 hours of suffering with these unacceptable conditions my Daughter also became ill (later that day it was diagnosed as a viral infection). If your child contracts chicken pox you might get a local GP to confirm it but instead of calling a doctor to look at him in the airport they took my partner and two young children (and of course very young children don&#8217;t have fully developed immune systems and are always prone to picking up bugs), none of whom had any inoculations/anti-malarial protection across Mumbai to two municipal third world hospitals, exposing them to all kinds of potential diseases. The airline attempted to get our children admitted into a filthy third world hospital for 5 days as an adequate response to their condition (which we refused to agree to). They then had another two hours in a dangerous vehicle until they got into a hotel. As a consequence this caused both my young children to get additional severe respiratory infections which meant they were not well enough to return home even after my son had been cleared to do so over the chicken pox, and requiring both to have antibiotic treatments before they could fly. </p>    <p>I am sure you can appreciate how stressful it was for my partner to be on her own with two young children unexpectedly thrown into India and then come against bullying tactics which meant she was forced to travel across the city with strangers who she did not trust. </p>    <p>Yes, they called me up from India to tell me that one of my family was dead, in error. Instead of explaining that there had been a mistake they just put the phone down on me. 10 seconds or 10 minutes, 10 days does the time make any difference? If you are a parent believe me it makes no difference. Of course I was relieved to find out that they were alive. Emirates called me back but never explained to me about the first call or apologised. They called again I believe to see if they had made a mistake but certainly not to explain it, I had to work that out myself - they have never provided an explanation to this day. And they did not even say sorry at that point. I finally received an apology from UK staff after 4PM, 9 hours after the original call. </p>    <p>Yes they did fly me out BUT THIS WAS NOT COMPENSATION. Had I fancied a week stuck in Mumbai for a holiday maybe it could be considered compensation. My insurance company had agreed immediately to fly me out to help get my family home. Emirates also offered to do so but this gesture of course does not compensate us in any way - it merely enabled me to fix all the problems that they had created and get my family home. </p>    <p>Staff blatantly lied, were uncooperative, were unhelpful, failed to call me back when they said they would, provided no method of actually getting to speak to a senior member of staff to deal with the case and unbelievably initially told me that in what was an immediate emergency situation they hoped to get back to me with a response possibly within eight days - providing I put everything in writing by email to them. </p>    <p>Local staff in Mumbai stuffed up my families emergency visa status meaning we had to drag our children across Mumbai (a two hour journey each way) to spend a day in a government office to pay a &#163;50 &#8220;fine&#8221; for them overstaying their emergency visas (because the kids had been made ill by Emirates actions they were unfit to fly for a further 5 days). </p>    <p>On the return flight home things directly in the control of the airline went from one problem to the next. They provided no food for our children for the whole day when they flew back to the UK, a flight which lasted 12 hours. The incompetent airline staff failed to re-book the original food we requested and paid for our children on the flights back from Mumbai. It was little surprise that both children arrived back in the UK totally stressed and in my daughters case physically ill once again. They then expected my three year old daughter to sit by herself on the flight from Dubai to Newcastle, putting us through the stress of having to argue and refusing to board the flight until the staff reluctantly sorted the problem out (after they once again lied to us, saying that the flight was full yet there were plenty of empty seats when we boarded) right upto the plane almost leaving. After all that had happened as a final insult the airline left our luggage behind in Dubai, so we had to wait and hour and a half in Newcastle Airport with two stressed kids only to find out our bags were not on the plane. The bags eventually arrived the next day, finally at our door after 5PM. </p>    <p>In addition Emirates cabin Staff subjected my partner to abuse. Cabin stuff vindictively harassed my partner and called her a bad mother as they mistakenly believed she had requested an upgrade to First Class for herself while flying to Australia in the first place! </p>    <p>When we got back to the UK I wrote to Emirates with a chronicle of all the events and appalling experiences they were responsible for. We pointed out that I had lost 8 days of work and we personally paid out over &#163;900 in costs to keep my family in Mumbai and get them home - the delay in returning was after all the result of their local staff. We additionally asked for compensation for the stress, ill-health etc which all the family experienced. I can assure you there was no specific mention of the phone call in this request. The experiences of my partner and children in India were a lot worse. Our request for recompense was based on the whole of our experience on this journey, not one phone call. </p>    <p>The airline wrote back and apologised for any inconvenience caused but refused us any compensation for anything which had happened. The airline has suggested that the medical treatment provided when they were disembarked was more than adequate for the circumstances and in the context of cultural differences between India and the UK. How can dangerous transport and exposure to third world conditions be in any way adequate or acceptable? We had full medical cover via insurance but the airline insisted on taking them      <br />- against their will and on the basis of lies from the local staff - and ended up having to sign waivers when we refused any further medical treatment in a filthy municipal hospital and requested a doctor attend once they had been housed in a quality safe local hotel. </p>    <p>Emirates website boasts how wonderful the experience of flying with young children will be from &#8220;booking to disembarking&#8221;. I certainly would not trust the care of my family in the hands of this airline ever again. I would also warn any other family to be extremely wary about booking a flight through Emirates based on what happened to us and how we saw other families were treated on their flights. As experienced travellers we were shocked by the utterly unbelievable series of events and the staggering incompetence. We put our family&#8217;s lives in these people&#8217;s hands when you fly and I would just not trust Emirates again. </p>    <p>Airlines are a law unto themselves, they can treat people how they like with very little recourse if things go wrong.I don&#8217;t think we were being at all unreasonable to expect that Emirates would compensate us accordingly for what was an extraordinary set of blunders. Instead Emirates dismissed us and the refusal to offer even a penny of compensation is an insult as it shows that they clearly don&#8217;t value customers and don&#8217;t consider our experience acceptable. Some gesture of compensation would have represented closure for the whole episode, offering nothing has left us angry and we were left with no option but to try and get back at the airline with the one thing left to us - bad publicity via the media. </p>    <p>Perhaps none of you will understand what really went on in my head that night, nor in the weeks afterwards but the feelings I have expressed in the media were totally genuine, open and honest. I actually fully told my partner what really happened that night only a few days ago. I still feel anger at the fact my family were put in danger and that as a consequence my children were made ill by the airlines actions. Of course I have the utmost sympathy for the devastated family of the guy who actually died; it will have been utterly devastating. No dispute. </p>    <p>I repeat, the media will simplify stories, the Radio 5 interview was also subject to edit and the questioning was pointed to only one aspect of the whole story I was trying to tell. </p>    <p>Please don&#8217;t jump to conclusions unless you have the facts. </p> </blockquote>  <p>I wasn't having the best of days, and at some point opened up a <a title="BBC NEWS | England | Tyne | Father wrongly told of air death" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/tyne/7332462.stm">BBC NEWS</a> report, and immediately jumped to the wrong conclusion based on what I had read.</p>  <p>Now in all the posts I've made on this site, and on all the other blogs I run or contribute to, I've never done something like this before. I try not to post anything I can't back up with facts and I usually research things to death.</p>  <p>Having lived in the US I was exposed to the &quot;sue the ass of anything that moves&quot; culture, and what with other things going on in my own life at the moment, I passed comment on something I wasn't qualified to pass comment on.&#160; As Chris points out above, &quot;don&#8217;t jump to conclusions unless you have the facts&quot;.</p>  <p>Needless to say, my post was quite offensive towards Chris Miller, but to give credit to him, he contacted me and was extremely polite and understanding.&#160; Had someone done something similar to me, I doubt if I would have had the same attitude, but I would like to think I would from now on.</p>  <p>Once again, I apologise to Chris for my foopar in my earlier post.</p>]]>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Sad Money Grabbing Airline Company</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.yaps4u.net/mt_archives/2008/04/sad_money_grabbing_git.html" />
<modified>2008-04-15T23:09:54Z</modified>
<issued>2008-04-15T23:10:48Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.yaps4u.net,2008://1.1169</id>
<created>2008-04-15T23:10:48Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">   An airline has apologised for wrongly telling a father a member of his family had died during a long-distance trip.               From: BBC News </summary>
<author>
<name>Chris Wright</name>
<url>http://www.yaps4u.net</url>
<email>blogs@yaps4u.net</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>General</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.yaps4u.net/">
<![CDATA[<p><strong>Updated: 15th April 2008      <br />This is a heavily edited version of the original post I made on the 6th April.       <br />Usually, I don't completely edit a post, but then usually I don't write a post which completely slams someone when I've based the facts on something I read from one single source (in this case the BBC).</strong></p>  <p><strong>To be fair to the BBC, it was probably my interpretation of the article that was skewed in addition to the BBC not giving the 'complete' story.</strong></p>  <p>Normally, this is just a personal blog full of &quot;nothing&quot; that no-one actually reads, it's just somewhere I can &quot;let go&quot;, where I don't have to concentrate on as much as my commercial/business blogs.    <br />Somehow I let my guard slip too far. I created this post in a few minutes and published it without due regard for the persons concerned.&#160; The person mentioned below has since contacted me and given me the full story.&#160; Now I know some of your will say, it's still only his side of the story, but the fact is, I made a rash post without the full facts, and that was entirely wrong for that reason alone.     <br />I will publish his full story (with his approval) and I'll think you'll agree that (1) I was entirely wrong in judging him the way I did and (2) the story as presented by the British media did not give the full picture.</p>  <p>So first and foremost, before I make the edits, I offer my sincere apologies to Chris Miller and for any further problems this may have caused.</p> ]]>
<![CDATA[  <blockquote>   <p><strong>An airline has apologised for wrongly telling a father a member of his family had died during a long-distance trip.        <br />        <br /></strong><a title="Father wrongly told of air death" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/tyne/7332462.stm">From: BBC News</a></p> </blockquote>  <p><strike></strike></p>  <p><strike>Initially I thought how terrible this must have been for the guy to go through. I mean,</strike> I'm a father of 3 kids and I was be devastated if I received a phone call like this.</p>  <p><strike>That was until I read further on into the story.</strike></p>  <blockquote>   <p>Mr Miller said he had received a call from someone saying: &quot;I have a couple of numbers for you, the first number is the undertakers dealing with the body&quot;. </p>    <p>Mr Miller said: &quot;At that point I believed one of my family was dead. I said, 'What happened, what's going on?' but they put the phone down on me. </p> </blockquote>  <p>Which must have been a terrible shock.    <br /><strike>But then you read on:</strike></p>  <blockquote>   <p>&quot;Then after 10 seconds they rang again to say it was a mistake.&quot;</p> </blockquote>  <p><strike>10 seconds ? Now don't get me wrong. Even one second is one second longer than I would ever want to deal with those thoughts.</strike>&#160; I <strike>probably</strike> would have crapped my pants and tried to contact the rest of the family to make sure they were OK, <strike>but in 10 seconds I probably would have not had a chance to lift the phone and dial the number.</strike></p>  <p></p>  <p><strike>So after 10seconds, what are this guys thoughts?      <br />Joy?       <br />Happiness?       <br />Relief?</strike></p>  <p><strike>Nope. He is complaining that the airline isn't willing to give him compensation.</strike></p>  <p><strike>Sort your life out you sad man.      <br />You have your daughter.       <br />She is safe.       <br />The airline apologised and I bet they apologised profusely.       <br />But the main part that you need to get through your money grabbing skull, is that you have your daughter.       <br />Ask them to make a donation to a charity in Africa so that some poor family can stand a chance of seeing their daughter live, but don't try and make money out of this accidental mix-up. </strike></p>  <p><strike>Your feelings were hurt and you messed a pair of your favourite track suit bottoms, but c'mon.&#160; This isn't the US where we sue at the drop of a hat.&#160; </strike></p>  <blockquote>   <p>&quot;Obviously to Emirates, putting a family through absolute hell is worth nothing. It is an unbelievable feeling to think one of your loved ones has died.&quot;</p> </blockquote>  <p><strike>Erm... for all of 10 seconds.      <br />I might have had some sympathy if he had been left to think this for days or weeks. I might even have let you away with a few hours. But 10 bloody seconds ?</strike></p>  <p><strike>Accept the apology and move on.      <br />Think about the parents and family of Michael Edgeley, the 22 year old who actually died.       <br />His family didn't get a call after 10 seconds, and they won't ever be getting a call. If you want to see real long term grief, go visit them.</strike> </p>  <p>So once again, my apologies to Chris.&#160; As you can see, once you take out my bad comments, there isn't much left.    <br />I will be creating a new post over the next few days, which hopefully is a little more balanced.</p>]]>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Clueless about Malware (And probably life too)</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.yaps4u.net/mt_archives/2008/04/clueless_about_malware_and_probably_1.html" />
<modified>2008-04-15T15:14:04Z</modified>
<issued>2008-04-15T15:13:09Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.yaps4u.net,2008://1.1173</id>
<created>2008-04-15T15:13:09Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain"><![CDATA[Here is an excerpt from a post made to a group that helps/deals with Malware reports on web sites. I can no longer visit this site through google. &quot;Warning - visiting this web site may harm your computer!&quot; This is...]]></summary>
<author>
<name>Chris Wright</name>
<url>http://www.yaps4u.net</url>
<email>blogs@yaps4u.net</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>around the web</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.yaps4u.net/">
<![CDATA[<p>Here is an excerpt from a post made to a group that helps/deals with Malware reports on web sites.</p>  <blockquote>   <p>I can no longer visit this site through google. &quot;Warning - visiting this web site may harm your computer!&quot; This is just a lie and I think we all know why this site is being persecuted. Keep your personal opinions and the opinions of your investors out of it. The deeper I dig in to the StopBadware.org manifesto the more obtuse your definitions become. A couple clicks and suddenly &quot;Site may harm your computer&quot; turns in to &quot;contains or links to badware or otherwise violates Google's software guidelines.&quot; I hope someone sues you silly.</p> </blockquote>  <p>It just goes to show the general level of ignorance out there from people that:</p>  <ol>   <li>     <p>Don't understand the size of the problem with regard to the sheer number of infected web sites.</p>   </li>    <li>     <p>Don't understand the dangers to there own machines when visiting such sites.</p>   </li> </ol>  <h3>Infected Web Sites</h3>  <p>In one case alone last week, 10,000+ sites were hacked and malware placed onto the sites.</p>  <p>In another case, a leading Advertising Agency that supplies adverts to 1000's of sites, unwittingly supplied an advert that carried malware.</p>  <p>And more alarmingly, a well known Anti-Virus/Spyware/Trojan Software manufacturer had it's own website hacked and malware placed on the site.</p>  <p>When Google or StopBadware report that there is malware on the site, you can bet that there is a very high probability that there is (or was at some point).&#160; The false positive count is extremely low when you consider the number of sites that are listed.</p> ]]>
<![CDATA[  <h3>How Safe Am I?</h3>  <p>Gone are the days when the you could say, &quot;But I don't use Internet Explorer, I use Firefox/Opera/Mozilla&quot; or &quot;I'm on a Mac/Linux&quot; etc etc etc.   <br />    <br />You must keep whatever system you use patched with the latest updates and with good Anti-Virus/Spyware and Rootkit detection. (If possible, use overlapping coverage from multiple products).</p>  <p>With one worm alone, during 2007 there were over 17,000 variants.&#160;&#160; That's around 47 variants a day.&#160; The worm went through multiple mutations a day !!</p>  <p>Most often a virus does not use a single attack vector, but will try a whole series of attacks looking at multiple security holes and it won't give in until it finds one. </p>  <h4></h4>  <h3>Protection from the bad guys and ourselves</h3>  <p>Not everyone is vulnerable to being infected and we are talking a very small percentage that are.&#160; But a very small percentage of a large number of users is still a large number of machines that are being added to 'botnets' on a daily basis.&#160; Some reports put this at hundreds of thousands of newly infected machines A DAY! And it's increasing.</p>  <p>Web site visitors must do their part in ensuring that their systems are fully protected, and web masters no matter whether large corporations or an &quot;at home, one man band&quot; must also ensure that their systems are fully protected. That includes any downloaded installations (such as blogs or forums).</p>  <p>Unlike the person above who appears to be in denial of any such problems, the responsibility lies at both ends of the browser! Don't become part of the problem, become part of the fight back!</p>]]>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Am I in Bramley or Texas? | Hail Storm</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.yaps4u.net/mt_archives/2008/04/am_i_in_bramley_or_texas_hail_storm.html" />
<modified>2008-04-14T03:11:34Z</modified>
<issued>2008-04-14T03:11:19Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.yaps4u.net,2008://1.1172</id>
<created>2008-04-14T03:11:19Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain"><![CDATA[The sky darkened and suddenly I was reminded of our 3 years in Texas.&#160; I looked at my wife and said, &quot;I think there's a storm a coming&quot;.&#160; One of our friends was visiting and as we all looked out...]]></summary>
<author>
<name>Chris Wright</name>
<url>http://www.yaps4u.net</url>
<email>blogs@yaps4u.net</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>General</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.yaps4u.net/">
<![CDATA[<p>The sky darkened and suddenly I was reminded of our 3 years in Texas.&#160; I looked at my wife and said, &quot;I think there's a storm a coming&quot;.&#160; One of our friends was visiting and as we all looked out of the window, the first few hail stones began to drop.</p>  <p>Nothing ominous at first. In the last few weeks we've had a few hail/sleet showers, but looking at the sky you could tell this was going to be something a bit more substantial. </p>  <p><a href="http://www.yaps4u.net/images/BramleyorTexasHailStorm_1457F/blur_P1060014.jpg"><img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; margin: 5px; border-right-width: 0px" border="0" alt="Hail Storm | Bramley | April 2008" align="right" src="http://www.yaps4u.net/images/BramleyorTexasHailStorm_1457F/blur_P1060014_thumb.jpg" width="244" height="184" /></a>Sure enough, there was a crack of thunder immediately following by an increase in the size of the hail.&#160; Now it was starting to remind us of Texas.&#160; (Although I will add here, the hail today never approached the golf ball sized hail we once had in Fort Worth).     <br />    <br />    <br />    <br />    <br />(Clicking on the images in this post opens up a larger version in the same window. Use your browser back button to return to the post)</p>  <p>&#160;</p> ]]>
<![CDATA[  <p>Over the next few minutes the clouds darkened even further and the thunder/lightening intensified to probably the most active storm I've seen (heard) since moving to Bramley four years ago.&#160; But, unlike Texas, I wasn't looking for the &quot;green&quot; tint to the sky that signified the possibility of a tornado.</p>  <p><a href="http://www.yaps4u.net/images/BramleyorTexasHailStorm_1457F/P1060029.jpg"><img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; margin: 5px 20px 5px 5px; border-right-width: 0px" border="0" alt="Hail Storm | Bramley | April 2008" align="left" src="http://www.yaps4u.net/images/BramleyorTexasHailStorm_1457F/P1060029_thumb.jpg" width="244" height="184" /></a>The hail stones started increasing in size to slight larger than a pea, but still way smaller than a marble. None the less, the noise was extremely loud and one of my dogs wasn't enjoying it at all.</p>  <p>&#160;</p>  <p>&#160;</p>  <p><a href="http://www.yaps4u.net/images/BramleyorTexasHailStorm_1457F/blur_P1060038.jpg"><img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; margin: 5px 5px 10px 15px; border-right-width: 0px" border="0" alt="Hail Storm | Bramley | April 2008" align="right" src="http://www.yaps4u.net/images/BramleyorTexasHailStorm_1457F/blur_P1060038_thumb.jpg" width="244" height="184" /></a>The storm probably lasted no more than 15minutes, but in that time over an inch of hail dropped out of the sky.&#160; Amazingly for Bramley, the power stayed on the whole time despite the number of lightening strikes that sounded quite close by, and even more amazing was the fact my broadband didn't drop once. (Usually it only takes a bird to fart whilst sitting atop the phone wire and it drops off-line).     <br />    <br />What with the floods last year that came cascading off the fields behind the village hall, through my back garden, through the garage, washing the gravel nearly 200yards down the road. The snow last week, the hail today, the weather seems to be turning for the worst. And with a 'typical British Summer' forecast, it makes you wonder what that entails. </p>  <p>&#160;</p>  <p><a href="http://www.yaps4u.net/images/BramleyorTexasHailStorm_1457F/blur_P1060038.jpg"></a></p>]]>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The quick way to shut down a phishing website!</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.yaps4u.net/mt_archives/2008/04/the_quick_way_to_shut_down_a_phising.html" />
<modified>2008-04-15T15:10:36Z</modified>
<issued>2008-04-09T01:21:23Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.yaps4u.net,2008://1.1171</id>
<created>2008-04-09T01:21:23Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain"><![CDATA[Ok, so I open up today's spam mail folder and there at the top of the queue is a phishing email 'from' the NatWest Bank. Clicking on the &quot;log in&quot; button takes you to a perfect replica of the NatWest...]]></summary>
<author>
<name>Chris Wright</name>
<url>http://www.yaps4u.net</url>
<email>blogs@yaps4u.net</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>General</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.yaps4u.net/">
<![CDATA[<p>Ok, so I open up today's spam mail folder and there at the top of the queue is a phishing email 'from' the NatWest Bank.</p>  <p>Clicking on the &quot;log in&quot; button takes you to a perfect replica of the NatWest site with a page for visitors to enter in their information to 'verify' their account.</p>  <p>The dead give away was the URL contained a non-NatWest looking domain.&#160; What caught my eye this time, was the fact that I recognised the website that had been hacked.</p>  <div class="csharpcode">   <pre class="alt">http://www.companyA.com/folder/folder/natwest.com</pre>

  <pre>rather than </pre>

  <pre class="alt">http://www.natwest.com</pre>
</div>
<style type="text/css">


.csharpcode, .csharpcode pre
{
	font-size: small;
	color: black;
	font-family: consolas, "Courier New", courier, monospace;
	background-color: #ffffff;
	/*white-space: pre;*/
}
.csharpcode pre { margin: 0em; }
.csharpcode .rem { color: #008000; }
.csharpcode .kwrd { color: #0000ff; }
.csharpcode .str { color: #006080; }
.csharpcode .op { color: #0000c0; }
.csharpcode .preproc { color: #cc6633; }
.csharpcode .asp { background-color: #ffff00; }
.csharpcode .html { color: #800000; }
.csharpcode .attr { color: #ff0000; }
.csharpcode .alt 
{
	background-color: #f4f4f4;
	width: 100%;
	margin: 0em;
}
.csharpcode .lnum { color: #606060; }</style>

<p>Rather than set up their own web server to 'host' the target bank web sites, one method the bad guys employ is to use a 'hacked' website.</p>

<p>In this case, the bad guys had obviously hacked their way into &quot;Company A's&quot; web server (who being an innocent party here, will remain anonymous). 
  <br />They then uploaded their imitation &quot;NatWest&quot; bank site to which they would direct users from within the phishing email. 

  <br />In this case, the phishing website would email any data entered into the fake form back to a central account which would be read by the attackers.</p>

<p>At the time of opening this email this morning, it already being detected by several anti-phishing filters, so at least those users would have been protected. (Note: If you haven't installed <a title="McAfee SiteAdvisor" href="http://www.siteadvisor.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">McAfee SiteAdvisor</a> toolbar for Firefox or IE, then go do it now. It's free and it works).</p>

<p></p>
]]>
<![CDATA[

<p>Out of interest and partly because I recognised the name of &quot;Company A&quot;, I went to their 'proper' web pages and looked for a contact number.</p>

<p>I gave them a ring and asked if they did their web development in house to which they confirmed, so I asked to be put through to that department. 
  <br />I then asked the guy who answered if he knew that their web server had been compromised and that a NatWest bank phishing site had been installed on their server. 

  <br />

  <br />Whilst denying that any such thing could ever happen because they have every protection under the sun installed on their servers, I gave him the URL to the fake NatWest site. </p>

<p>The silence was deafening.</p>

<p>Needless to say, the fake NatWest website was taken down right there and then, (in fact I wouldn't be surprised if he pulled the damn plug out of the wall he sounded that panicked!, except it was being hosted on a server based in Germany run by a well known popular web hosting company)</p>

<p>My main point is, the email had been out there in the wild for at least 12 hours, delivered to millions if not 100's of millions of email accounts. 
  <br />It had already been reported by a significant number of users/visitors as a phishing web site, it already existed on multiple blacklists, yet no one had thought to actually ring the number of the 'proper' website and inform them. 

  <br />Even the &quot;whois&quot; information on the main website had contact information. 

  <br />The guy who had access to all the contact email addresses said they had received no reports whatsoever.</p>

<p>Doesn't anyone remember how to use the phone these days? 
  <br />One quick phone call. 

  <br />5mins later, one less phishing website.</p>

<p>Now I know, this isn't always as simple as this. But you'd like to think someone would at least try.</p>

<p>(Note: I would not recommend anyone clicking on links in Phishing or spam emails or in fact any link in any email that you don't know who it came from or why.&#160; Some emails contain tracking codes to tell the 'bad guys' just who is clicking, and you could open yourself up to a barrage of spam/phishing mails by confirming someone exists at the end of the email address they sent.&#160; Not only that, but the web sites could also carry malware designed to infect your computer.&#160; So unless you know what you are doing, don't ever click any spam or phishing emails no matter how curious you are!).</p>]]>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Internet Sharks - Domain Registration or Daylight Robbery</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.yaps4u.net/mt_archives/2008/04/internet_sharks_domain_registration.html" />
<modified>2008-04-15T15:12:33Z</modified>
<issued>2008-04-06T01:46:25Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.yaps4u.net,2008://1.1170</id>
<created>2008-04-06T01:46:25Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">A couple of years back I took advantage of an introductory offer on a .co.uk TLD domain name. I can&apos;t remember the exact deal, but at the time it was something like &amp;#163;2 for a 2 year registration. At the...</summary>
<author>
<name>Chris Wright</name>
<url>http://www.yaps4u.net</url>
<email>blogs@yaps4u.net</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>General</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.yaps4u.net/">
<![CDATA[<p>A couple of years back I took advantage of an introductory offer on a .co.uk TLD domain name.    <br />I can't remember the exact deal, but at the time it was something like &#163;2 for a 2 year registration.</p>  <p>At the time, that was cheaper than my current registrar which worked out at about &#163;1.99 per year, so &#163;2 for 2 years wasn't to be scoffed at (especially when you are registering 50 or so .co.uk's a month).</p>  <p>The first of them is nearing renewal and so the 60 day renewal warning turned up in my inbox, and as I expected they increased their renewal price to &#163;9.99 a year.&#160; I'd already started the transfer to my current registrar so it wasn't a problem. As I said, I was expecting the hike, and I only registered with them to take advantage of saving a packet.</p>  <p>What I didn't expect was an email from <strong>Nominet</strong>.</p>  <p><strong>Nominet </strong>is the Internet Registry for ALL .uk TLD's. </p> ]]>
<![CDATA[  <h2>How Domain Registration Works</h2>  <p>The next part is to give you a basic understanding of how domain name registration works.</p>  <p>Basically, there are <strong>Internet Registries</strong> responsible for certain <strong>TLD's</strong>.&#160; No matter who you register your .uk domain name with, they are all held with <strong>Nominet</strong>.</p>  <ul>   <li>Anyone who sells domain names is called a <strong><em>Domain Registrar</em></strong>.       <br /></li>    <li>The <strong><em>Domain Registrar</em></strong> buys domain names in bulk from a <strong>Domain Internet Registry.</strong> </li> </ul>  <p>If we take the domain name <a href="http://www.example.com">www.example.com</a>, the &quot;.com&quot; is known as the <strong>TLD</strong> - the <strong>Top Level Domain</strong> (sometimes also called the <strong>TLDN - Top Level Domain Name</strong>). </p>  <ul>   <li>So a a TLD is a top-level-domain, i.e the end part of a domain.      <br /></li>    <li>For each TLD there is a <strong>domain registry</strong>. </li> </ul>  <h2>Nominet</h2>  <p>Ok, end of lesson and back to the main point of my post.    <br />The email contained notification that my domain was going to expire within 30days and contained an offer to renew the domain directly with <strong>Nominet</strong>.</p>  <blockquote>   <p>For the attention of Chris Wright      <br />==================================       <br />QUANTITY : 1       <br />DETAILS: Domain Name Renewal .co.uk       <br />PRICE PER ITEM: 80.00       <br />NET TOTAL: 80.00       <br />VAT%: 17.50       <br />VAT: 14.00       <br />TOTAL: 94.00       <br />=======================================       <br />Amounts shown are pounds sterling (GBP)       <br />=======================================</p> </blockquote>  <p>First off, I will admit that at the start of the email it did advise me to re-register the domain name with the current registrar, so it's not that this is under-handed. It's just the price that they wanted to charge that caught my attention. &#163;47 a year !! That is &#163;46 a year more than I currently pay to my regular domain registrar.    <br />Now I know there are markups, but that is one hell of a increase.     <br />    <br />You don't get nothing extra by registering the domain directly with <strong>Nominet</strong> for the extra cost. But, at least <strong>Nominet </strong>make it quite clear that you <em><strong>should</strong> re-</em>register your domain name with your current registrar and they stress that it <strong><em>will/should be</em></strong> much cheaper to do so.</p>  <h2>Domain Registry Of America</h2>  <p>Which brings me onto my second incident which is far more serious.</p>  <p>The infamous &quot;<strong>Domain Registry Of America</strong>&quot; are at it again.     <br />The actions of this organisation are nothing short of a scam designed to trick people into paying extortionate amounts for domain renewal and causing them to transfer their domains from their current registrar.</p>  <p>Then send out a very nice letter that looks very much like a domain name renewal form telling you about how your domain name is due to expire and give you all the details required to renew.&#160; Except, you won't be renewing at all, you will be transferring your domain from your current registrar, and with a massive price hike too.&#160; They have changed their forms over the past few years, in that there now is the smallest of small print informing you that you are transferring your domain name to them.</p>  <p>Don't get me wrong, the letter doesn't make any attempt to hide that it is the &quot;Domain Registry of America&quot;, nor does it purport to come from your current registrar.&#160; </p>  <p>To someone like me, it's obvious as soon as I open the letter that it's nothing short of a scam.&#160; I should have scanned the one I received last week, but I'm afraid they end up in the shredder within 2ns of dropping through the post box. I then take a good hand full of the shredded paper, fill the supplied envelope, and pop it back in the postbox (they used to be prepaid in the UK, but now they even want me to waste the price of a stamp on them).&#160; </p>  <p>To those unfamiliar with the domain registration process it looks far too official and the prices they charge are many times over the industry average. (In fact their prices are so high, they probably are not included in averages since they would skew the results so much).</p>  <h2>What should you do?</h2>  <p>No matter who you register your domain with, you have a right to transfer your domain to any registrar that handles your TLD.</p>  <p>There are certain periods during domain registration that you may not initiate a transfer.&#160; The exact details of these can be found at the Domain Internet Registry for each particular TLD.</p>  <p>When you accidentally let a domain name expire, it should enter a period whereby no-one else can register the domain. The longer you leave your domain in this period, the more the domain registrar can charge you to get it back. This period is designed to ensure that you can get your domain back when you accidentally let it expire. Be sure to check the prices charged for this with your domain registrar.</p>  <p>Shop around for the best price before you register a domain, and when the domain is up for renewal. </p>  <p>Instead of letting a domain name expire because you no longer require it, put it up for auction. Some domain names have sold for millions, (most don't to be honest, but you never know who is watching or waiting for your domain name to expire).</p>  <p>When searching for the availability of a domain, use a well known registry service.&#160; There are some that will monitor the domains being tested and pre-register any that sound good.&#160; They can effectively hold your domain name to ransom charging you what ever they want.</p>  <h2>What you Shouldn't Do</h2>  <p>Never buy your domain from the first place you find.</p>  <p>Never buy your domain from the Internet Domain Registry for your TLD. (Search for a domain registrar)</p>  <p>Don't ever renew or buy your domain with The &quot;Domain Registry of America&quot; (<a title="Don&#39;t use this company or you&#39;ll lose an arm and a leg" href="http://www.droa.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">DRoA</a>)</p>]]>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Clueless about Malware (And probably life too)</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.yaps4u.net/mt_archives/2008/03/clueless_about_malware_and_probably.html" />
<modified>2008-03-19T07:12:21Z</modified>
<issued>2008-03-18T10:28:40Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.yaps4u.net,2008://1.1167</id>
<created>2008-03-18T10:28:40Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Here is an excerpt from a post made to a group that helps/deals with Malware reports on web sites. I can no longer visit this site through google. &quot;Warning - visiting this web site may harm your computer!&quot; This is...</summary>
<author>
<name>Chris Wright</name>
<url>http://www.yaps4u.net</url>
<email>blogs@yaps4u.net</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>around the web</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.yaps4u.net/">
<![CDATA[<p>Here is an excerpt from a post made to a group that helps/deals with Malware
  reports on web sites.</p>
<blockquote>
  <p>I can no longer visit this site through google. "Warning - visiting this
    web site may harm your computer!" This is just a lie and I think we all know
    why this site is being persecuted. Keep your personal opinions and the opinions
    of your investors out of it. The deeper I dig in to the StopBadware.org manifesto
    the more obtuse your definitions become. A couple clicks and suddenly "Site
    may harm your computer" turns in to "contains or links to badware or otherwise
    violates Google's software guidelines." I hope someone sues you silly.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It just goes to show the general level of ignorance out there from people
  that:</p>
<ol>
  <li>
    <p>Don't understand the size of the problem with regard to the sheer number
      of infected web sites.</p>
  <li>
    <p>Don't understand the dangers to there own machines when visiting such
      sites.</p>
  </li>
</ol>
<h3>Infected Web Sites</h3>
<p>In one case alone last week, 10,000+ sites were hacked and malware placed
  onto the sites.</p>
<p>In another case, a leading Advertising Agency that supplies adverts to 1000's
  of sites, unwittingly supplied an advert that carried malware.</p>
<p>And more alarmingly, a well known Anti-Virus/Spyware/Trojan Software manufacturer
  had it's own website hacked and malware placed on the site.</p>
<p>When Google or StopBadware report that there is malware on the site, you can
  bet that there is a very high probability that there is (or was at some point).&nbsp; The
  false positive count is extremely low when you consider the number of sites
  that are listed.</p>
<h3>How Safe Am I?</h3>
<p>Gone are the days when the you could say, "But I don't use Internet Explorer,
  I use Firefox/Opera/Mozilla" or "I'm on a Mac/Linux" etc etc etc.<br>
  <br>
  You must keep whatever system you use patched with the latest updates and with
  good Anti-Virus/Spyware and Rootkit detection. (If possible, use overlapping
  coverage from multiple products).</p>
<p>With one worm alone, during 2007 there were over 17,000 variants.&nbsp;&nbsp; That's
  around 47 variants a day.&nbsp; The worm went through multiple mutations a
  day !!</p>
<p>Most often a virus does not use a single attack vector, but will try a whole
  series of attacks looking at multiple security holes and it won't give in until
  it finds one. </p>
<h3>Protection from the bad guys and ourselves</h3>
<p>Not everyone is vulnerable to being infected and we are talking a very small
  percentage that are.&nbsp; But a very small percentage of a large number of
  users is still a large number of machines that are being added to 'botnets'
  on a daily basis.&nbsp; Some reports put this at hundreds of thousands of newly
  infected machines A DAY! And it's increasing.</p>
<p>Web site visitors must do their part in ensuring that their systems are fully
  protected, and web masters no matter whether large corporations or an "at home,
  one man band" must also ensure that their systems are fully protected. That
  includes any downloaded installations (such as blogs or forums).</p>
<p>Unlike the person above who appears to be in denial of any such problems,
  the responsibility lies at both ends of the browser! Don't become part of the
  problem, become part of the fight back!</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Harry to be withdrawn from Afghanistan</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.yaps4u.net/mt_archives/2008/02/harry_to_be_withdrawn_from_afghanist.html" />
<modified>2008-02-29T21:56:49Z</modified>
<issued>2008-02-29T13:58:46Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.yaps4u.net,2008://1.1166</id>
<created>2008-02-29T13:58:46Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain"> Prince Harry is to be pulled out of Afghanistan after news of his secret deployment leaked out. View Original Article What has made me laugh about the press coverage are those arguing that the UK Media should never have...</summary>
<author>
<name>Chris Wright</name>
<url>http://www.yaps4u.net</url>
<email>blogs@yaps4u.net</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>General</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.yaps4u.net/">
<![CDATA[<blockquote>
  <p>Prince Harry is to be pulled out of Afghanistan after news of his secret
    deployment leaked out.</p>
  <p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk/7270743.stm">View Original
      Article</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>What has made me laugh about the press coverage are those arguing that the
  UK Media should never have kept it quiet because "the people" have a right
  to know.</p>
<p>A right to know what? This is not just Harry's life we are talking about here,
  what about those around him who would be put in danger. And what possible reasons
  could "the UK public" have for wanting to know where he is and what he is doing
  24/7 365 days of the year.</p>
<p>Give me a break.&nbsp; He's human, just like the rest of us. He leads a different
  life to pretty much everyone else, but why should he be denied his privacy.&nbsp; (Obviously
  because of who he is and what he does there will be some aspects of this life
  that will always be public, but where do you draw the line ?)</p>
<p>Those same retards that are harking on about how it's some sort of cover up
  and a denial of freedom of information are probably the same bunch who would
  object to a National UK DNA database on the grounds of it being too much like
  a Police State activity.</p>
<p>There are some people that won't be happy until they have hounded Harry into
  doing something that will get him killed, not that it hasn't happened before...
  Let me see, who was his mother again?&nbsp; Journalist scum who prey on peoples
  public lives are the lowest forms of life IMHO.</p>
<p>We seem to have lost the distinction between public and private and the media
  of this day and age seems to have no responsibility what so ever. Viewing figures
  and sensationalism are all that matters. </p>
<p>Good on Harry for going over there in the first place and kudos to the brass
  who had the balls to make the decision to send him.</p>
]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Holly Dolly - Dolly Song (Ieva&apos;s Polka)</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.yaps4u.net/mt_archives/2007/10/holly_dolly_dolly_song_ievas_polka.html" />
<modified>2007-10-05T17:38:03Z</modified>
<issued>2007-10-05T14:35:58Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.yaps4u.net,2007://1.1165</id>
<created>2007-10-05T14:35:58Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">I herd ;) it once, now you lot can suffer...</summary>
<author>
<name>Chris Wright</name>
<url>http://www.yaps4u.net</url>
<email>blogs@yaps4u.net</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>General</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.yaps4u.net/">
<![CDATA[<p>I herd ;) it once, now you lot can suffer</p>

<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ffqy8U4ceFA"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ffqy8U4ceFA" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Time to get some new Bulbs again :(</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.yaps4u.net/mt_archives/2007/09/time_to_get_some_new_bulbs_again.html" />
<modified>2007-09-03T15:34:26Z</modified>
<issued>2007-09-03T12:40:15Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.yaps4u.net,2007://1.1164</id>
<created>2007-09-03T12:40:15Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">The boys were playing indoor football again... And it was bound to happen, he says looking at them mowing the back yard for me... Every bulb I use in this house came from one of the best online stores I&apos;ve...</summary>
<author>
<name>Chris Wright</name>
<url>http://www.yaps4u.net</url>
<email>blogs@yaps4u.net</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Around the Home</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.yaps4u.net/">
<![CDATA[<p>The boys were playing indoor football again... And it was bound to happen, he says looking at them mowing the back yard for me...</p> <p><br><a title="GLS Style Bayonet 15 Watt" href="http://www.ebulbshop.com/acatalog/GLS_Style_Bayonet_15_watt.html" target="_blank" atomicselection="true"><img height="155" alt="GLS Style Bayonet Fit (BC) 15 Watt Compact Fluorescent Lamp Long Life" src="http://www.ebulbshop.com/acatalog/58v.jpg" width="155" align="right" border="0"></a>Every bulb I use in this house came from one of the best online stores I've seen, not only for usability, but for the sheer numbers and types of <a title="ebulb shop" href="http://www.ebulbshop.com/acatalog/shop.html" target="_blank">GLS and CFL's</a> they stock in their e-shop.&nbsp;</p> <p>I've just used my last spare bulb and on visiting the site, I see they stock a lot more items than when I last visited.</p> <p><a title="Oven Lamp Small Screw Fit (SES)" href="http://www.ebulbshop.com/acatalog/Over_Lamp_Small_Screw_Fit_15_Watt.html" target="_blank" atomicselection="true"><img height="155" alt="Oven Lamp Small Screw Fit (SES)" src="http://www.ebulbshop.com/acatalog/25.jpg" width="155" align="left" border="0"></a>I spent ages looking for a new bulb for the oven a few weeks back and in the end gave up. None of the stores round here stocked one, and the guy in B&amp;Q even tried to convince me that they "don't make em' like that anymore, can I interest you in a new oven sir..."</p> <p>Having just logged into the ebulb shop, they jumped out at me, and low and behold, my lamp is the second one down on the list.&nbsp; Looks like I'll be ordering a couple of them as well.&nbsp; ebulb is just that... it's not just CFL's, I reckon if you get light from it, they'll stock it.</p> <p>You can tell its been a few months (years??) since I last checked that site.&nbsp; I've just spent a good while looking at all the new stuff they stock.</p> <p>Never ever buy a bulb from your supermarket or dare I say your local DIY shop.&nbsp; Even if they are non-filament type, I don't have any faith that they haven't been throwing around the boxes that the bulbs were supplied in.<br>A few weeks back when I was away, my wife bought two new bulbs from a large well known supermarket and both bulbs were broken, when she went back to change them, she found that most of the bulbs on the shelves were damaged in some way.&nbsp; It was like someone had been playing football with them, (and no, my two boys were not with her).<br>She didn't realise I had a box of spares out in the garage (which was the original box supplied from <a title="Best place to buy bulbs online" href="http://www.ebulbshop.com/" target="_blank">ebulbshop</a>.<br>That's the other thing about buying from a specialist. They not only can give you the best advice on which product you need, they also know how to look after the product right up until it reaches your front door.&nbsp; </p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Get Friends on Facebook (The Facebook song)</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.yaps4u.net/mt_archives/2007/08/get_friends_on_facebook_the_facebook.html" />
<modified>2007-08-04T01:14:15Z</modified>
<issued>2007-08-03T22:25:38Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.yaps4u.net,2007://1.1163</id>
<created>2007-08-03T22:25:38Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain"> So how many friends do you have on Facebook? IceRocket Tags: Facebook Song, Facebook Friends Song...</summary>
<author>
<name>Chris Wright</name>
<url>http://www.yaps4u.net</url>
<email>blogs@yaps4u.net</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>around the web</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.yaps4u.net/">
<![CDATA[<p><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/-PH4aElf6CU" width="425" height="350" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent"></p> <p>So how many friends do you have on Facebook?</p> <p></embed></p> <div class="wlWriterSmartContent" id="0767317B-992E-4b12-91E0-4F059A8CECA8:16e73386-9476-4505-b89e-284cec7dc258" contenteditable="false" style="padding-right: 0px; display: inline; padding-left: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-top: 0px">IceRocket Tags: <a href="http://blogs.icerocket.com/search?q=Facebook%20Song" rel="tag">Facebook Song</a>, <a href="http://blogs.icerocket.com/search?q=Facebook%20Friends%20Song" rel="tag">Facebook Friends Song</a></div>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Google and StopBadware.org : Hide not Label</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.yaps4u.net/mt_archives/2007/07/google_and_stopbadwareorg_hide_not_l.html" />
<modified>2007-07-31T01:51:31Z</modified>
<issued>2007-07-30T20:31:42Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.yaps4u.net,2007://1.1162</id>
<created>2007-07-30T20:31:42Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain"><![CDATA[For those web masters or indeed visitors out there that are not aware, StopBadWare.org is a site that lists sites that contain malware.&nbsp; This article doesn't discuss how they malware got there, but more the way that Google lists them...]]></summary>
<author>
<name>Chris Wright</name>
<url>http://www.yaps4u.net</url>
<email>blogs@yaps4u.net</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>around the web</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.yaps4u.net/">
<![CDATA[<p>For those web masters or indeed visitors out there that are not aware, StopBadWare.org is a site that lists sites that contain malware.&nbsp; This article doesn't discuss how they malware got there, but more the way that Google lists them in its index.</p> <blockquote> <p>StopBadware.org is a "Neighborhood Watch" campaign aimed at fighting <a href="http://stopbadware.org/home/help">badware</a>. We will seek to provide reliable, objective information about downloadable applications in order to help consumers to make better choices about what they download on to their computers. We aim to become a central clearinghouse for research on badware and the bad actors who spread it, and to become a focal point for developing collaborative, community-minded approaches to stopping badware.<br><br>From: <a title="Fighting Badware | Central Clearinghouse for research on badware" href="http://www.stopbadware.org">StopBadware.org</a></p></blockquote> <p>When a site is listed in Google as having badware on it, a warning is displayed similar to the following:</p> <p><a href="http://www.yaps4u.net/images/95275edb1854_120CC/googlewarning1.png" atomicselection="true"><img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px" height="78" alt="googlewarning1" src="http://www.yaps4u.net/images/95275edb1854_120CC/googlewarning1_thumb.png" width="465" border="0"></a> </p> <p>The contentious part of the above warning is the "This site may harm your computer".<br>When you click on the link within the Google index to a badware infected site, Google actually displays an information page telling you why you should not visit the site. (Note: I have purposely masked the name of the site above in order to protect the web site owner from being mentioned, the reasons why are discussed below).</p> <p>If you want to see a warning for yourself, just go to the <a title="Fighting Badware | Central Clearinghouse for research on badware" href="http://www.stopbadware.org">StopBadware.org</a> site. In the search box, enter ".co.uk" for the search term.<br>Copy the 'domain name part' part of it but do not include the TLD and enter it in a Google search box.&nbsp; (So if the domain was www.example-alien-web-design.co.uk, search for "example alien web design" not "example-alien-web-design.co.uk".<br>This 'should' display a list of search results which will have the warning displayed. <br>Then click the search result to see the warning page.</p> <p>My personal thought is that Google should just temporarily remove the site listing from the index rather than apply a label against that site.<br>You have to ask why Google apply that label and prevent 'its' users from clicking on that link within it's index. <br>I can only guess at the following:</p> <ul> <li>Google wishes to protect its users from visiting a site that has malware on it.<br>(Google has checks in place, or one would hope that they do, that prevents falsely labelling a site as hosting malware). <br> <li>Google is also expressing it's desire to help remove malware from the 'internet' by contacting and informing web masters of malware upon the sites it finds. <br>It doesn't just list web sites, it does make a concerted effort to contact the web master of the site involved.</li></ul> <p>Google do have a right to stop users from visiting those sites infected, as potentially one could argue that they could be held responsible for forwarding its users to a site which ultimately costs the visitor time/money or both.<br>The problem is, that web masters feel that the label Google applies next to their entry in the index causes damage to the reputation of that web site as well as a loss of income.&nbsp; <br><br>So why does Google apply a label?<br>Some have argued that it is the quickest method to ensure that the web master contacts them and the problem sorted.<br>(Sticking a big red flag next to your site does tend to bring it to your attention rather quickly when your users start complaining to you, OR, as should be happening, a good web master will find this out when he does his daily/weekly check).</p> <p>I would rather&nbsp;Google remove the entry from the index altogether, not stick a "<em>label</em>" against the entry.&nbsp; You can't visit the site from the link in the index anyway (without a spot of cutting and pasting - at least you can't in Firefox with my setup).You could say the link in the index is non-functional, so why bother putting it there in the first place?<br>Removing the infected site from the index achieves both points from above.</p> <ul> <li>It prevents Google users from visiting the site.&nbsp; The result is simply not returned.<br>It is no different from the supplemental index, or at least very similar to the supplemental index.<br>After all, the StopBadware database is exactly that. It is an index of sites that contain or are believed to contain malware. <br>Just like the supplemental index, the results are still there, but you have to search for them in a specific index.&nbsp; <br> <li>Google can still contact web masters and let them know that their site has been placed into the 'malware' index as before.</li></ul> <p>The removal or placement into the "malware" index would be temporary. Rather than display a warning, it doesn't display anything.&nbsp; No harder to code than it is at present.&nbsp;</p> <p>Any decent web master will be monitoring his PR and his SERP placement.&nbsp; Suddenly dropping off the main Google index should be pretty obvious to them.<br>And if his visitors complain that they are not finding the web site in the index, that too should draw the web masters attention to a possible problem.<br><br>Google will still be trying to contact the web master and the web master should also be encouraged to join Webmaster central (http://www.google.com/webmasters/) to keep an eye on their site anyway...</p> <p>However, web masters have no right what so ever to complain about the damage to their reputation.&nbsp; Malware is a problem, and is far more serious to their users than a lot would lead you to believe.&nbsp; Ok, you could say that around 85% of your visitors would be vulnerable to being attacked by malware (due to the browser type, security settings and whether javascript is enabled). Of of that 85%, at least 50% of them would be very vulnerable, due to no firewall, no or an outdated Antivirus/Antispyware.<br>So there would be a large percentage of your visitors that could potentially be damaged or effected by malware.</p> <ul> <li>You cannot say that some malware is less harmful than others. <br>Malware is malware. Plain and simple.<br> <li>You cannot say I have a set of known visitors and I know them to be safe.<br>(You are complaining about being in the Google index, therefore you are potentially available to everyone who has access to the Google index). </li></ul> <p>What damage would be done to your reputation IF, one of your users blogger on a popular forum that they went to www.example.com and they got hacked.&nbsp; That www.example.com has no protection, or www.example.com has bad security. Or they blame www.example.com for them installing the malware on their computers (regardless of the fact that www.example.com had NO knowledge of the exploit in the first place).<br>At least an entry in the Google index as at present is temporary and will be removed once Google are assured that the malware has been removed.<br>An entry on a web site would be within the index for a lot longer (if not ever).<br>And that's if there was just one entry on one blog.&nbsp; What you would do if your sites name was spread around the web by a disgruntled visitor (who was infected as a result of visiting your www.example.com)<br>There is no argument that the web master purposely allowed their site to become infected. <br>A web master of a major site earning major money will be running a much more secure system than a small time web hosting company (on a dedicated server or a shared web hosted account).&nbsp; They are less likely to be the victim of an attack.<br>So it&nbsp;could appear that Google are against the smaller web hosts and web masters since you won't find big web sites listed. That is simply not the case.&nbsp; <br>It is just the simple fact that the smaller web site, web host or web master is more vulnerable to attack since they cannot or do not spend money on massive security defenses against malware attacks. </p> <p>A web master has a&nbsp;responsibility to protect the visitors to their site. (Whether they rely upon the web host to do this , or whether they takes charge is another matter for discussion).<br>Google have the same responsibility to it's users. They have chosen to protect their users by displaying a warning and not giving a clickable link to the infected web site.</p> <p>I'd like to hear from Google as to why they chose the method they did, and for them to state why they don't just remove the link temporarily from the index.</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>NIMBY&apos;s vs. 36 Grays Lane</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.yaps4u.net/mt_archives/2007/07/nimbys_vs_36_grays_lane.html" />
<modified>2007-07-27T02:01:07Z</modified>
<issued>2007-07-26T23:00:21Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.yaps4u.net,2007://1.1161</id>
<created>2007-07-26T23:00:21Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain"><![CDATA[ A soldiers Story (fictional) You're on your last patrol before your unit returns home after a 9month stint in Iraq.&nbsp; You're on point covering for your squad as they return to the Warrior after inspecting a suspected arms dump...]]></summary>
<author>
<name>Chris Wright</name>
<url>http://www.yaps4u.net</url>
<email>blogs@yaps4u.net</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>around the web</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.yaps4u.net/">
<![CDATA[<blockquote> <h3>A soldiers Story (fictional)</h3> <p><a href="http://www.yaps4u.net/images/NimbyBrigadeCalltoArmsTheBattleof36Grays_10401/250pxBasra_location.png" atomicselection="true"><img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; margin: 5px; border-right-width: 0px" height="193" alt="250px-Basra_location" src="http://www.yaps4u.net/images/NimbyBrigadeCalltoArmsTheBattleof36Grays_10401/250pxBasra_location_thumb.png" width="180" align="right" border="0"></a>You're on your last patrol before your unit returns home after a 9month stint in Iraq.&nbsp; You're on point covering for your squad as they return to the Warrior after inspecting a suspected arms dump on the outskirts of Basra. <br></p> <p>Spirits are high because tonight's scran in the mess tent will be the last meal before you get home to your mum's Sunday roast.&nbsp; In 8 hours, you'll be on the plane home in to the arms of the family you've been away from for so long.&nbsp;</p> <p><a href="http://www.yaps4u.net/images/NimbyBrigadeCalltoArmsTheBattleof36Grays_10401/warrior.jpg" atomicselection="true"><img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; margin: 5px; border-right-width: 0px" height="90" alt="warrior" src="http://www.yaps4u.net/images/NimbyBrigadeCalltoArmsTheBattleof36Grays_10401/warrior_thumb.jpg" width="125" align="left" border="0"></a></p> <p>Your squad mates begin shouting, they are pointing towards 3 youths running out of a nearby building.&nbsp; You are almost at the Warrior when there is an almighty 'whoosh', followed by a loud explosion. </p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>When you open your eyes, you find yourself 20ft away from the Warrior.&nbsp; You can't focus on anything, you can't hear anything. The dust is settling and you begin to see your surroundings. You try to clear the dust from your eyes, but there is something wrong. You look down towards your hand and there's nothing there. In a panic, you try to stand, but you fall over.&nbsp; The bottom of your left leg is missing. In pain you slump down to the ground as the rest of your unit reaches you.</p> <p>The next time you wake, you find yourself in the Military Hospital in Basra.&nbsp; The medics have had to amputate your right arm from below the elbow, you've lost the left leg below the knee, and you are blind in your right eye.<br>After a week or so, you are transferred to the facility at Headley Court.</p></blockquote> <p>The above could have happened to any number of our serving personnel in Basra or in fact any of the current overseas theatre of operations.&nbsp; But in this case, it's a fictional story. But there have been many of our service personnel over the years who have and are still going through similar experiences.</p> <p>But the hardship doesn't end there. Once the injured personnel come back to the UK, there is yet more pain to endure, but this time by the families of the victims themselves.&nbsp; <br>Often families have to travel hundreds of miles to visit their loved ones.&nbsp; Living in a hotel or bed and breakfast is fine for a brief business trip or a short holiday, but when the family themselves are having to deal with the emotions involved with supporting an injured loved one, it creates unwanted stress.</p> <p><a title="The Fisher House | Supporting America's military" href="http://www.fisherhouse.org/" atomicselection="true"><img style="margin: 5px" height="179" alt="the fisher house" src="http://www.yaps4u.net/images/NimbyBrigadeCalltoArmsTheBattleof36Grays_10401/fisherhouse.gif" width="180" align="right" border="0"></a> In the US an organization known as "<a title="The Fisher House | Supporting America's military" href="http://www.fisherhouse.org/">The Fisher House</a>" exists which quotes the following on their web site.</p> <blockquote> <p>Supporting America's military in their time of need, we provide <em>"a home away from home"</em> that enables family members to be close to a loved one at the most stressful time -- during hospitalization for an illness, disease or injury</p></blockquote> <h3>Headley Court and the SSAFA</h3> <p>RAF Headley Court near Epsom in Headley, Surrey, England deals with with UK Military Forces personnel&nbsp;with physical disabilities obtained during service, and also deals with patients suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder.</p> <p>With a dedicated staff of around 200, the care it provides is essential to the recovery of the personnel.&nbsp; In 2005, Major David Bradley of the Princess of Wales‘s Royal Regiment was given a five per cent chance of survival as a result of injuries received whilst on duty in Iraq during 2004. Headley Court played a vital part in ensuring he had the best chance of recovery.</p> <p>Having family around you during recovery is an important factor (and I know this from personal experience). Not only do families have to deal with looking at the some times horrific injuries to their loved ones, many patients will often reject the attention of their families, pushing them away as a result of their injuries, which causes further stress.&nbsp; </p> <p>The Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Families Association (<a title="The Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Families Association (SSAFA)" href="http://www.ssafa.org.uk/">SSAFA</a>) exists in the UK to help out where ever it can. </p> <blockquote> <p><a title="SSAFA | The Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Families Association (SSAFA)" href="http://www.ssafa.org.uk/" atomicselection="true"><img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; margin: 5px; border-right-width: 0px" height="107" alt="ssafa" src="http://www.yaps4u.net/images/NimbyBrigadeCalltoArmsTheBattleof36Grays_10401/ssafa.jpg" width="125" align="left" border="0"></a> The Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Families Association (SSAFA) Forces Help is the leading national charity committed to helping and supporting those who serve in our Armed Forces, those who used to serve, and the families of both.&nbsp; We provide a reliable, caring and trusted service to more than 50,000 people each year.</p></blockquote> <h3>36 Grays Lane</h3> <p>&nbsp;The <a title="The Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Families Association (SSAFA)" href="http://www.ssafa.org.uk/">SSAFA</a>&nbsp;were hoping to provide a home away from home for the family members visiting loved ones being treated at Headley Court, but met with some unexpected resistance from local residents.</p> <p>It appears that a bunch of NIMBY's have been coming up with all sorts of reasons why 36 Grays Lane should not be used by <a title="The Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Families Association (SSAFA)" href="http://www.ssafa.org.uk/">SSAFA</a>.&nbsp; To see some of their reasons, visit the <a title="36 Grays Lane | Resident Concerns" href="http://www.36grayslane.co.uk/concerns.html">36grayslane</a> web site.</p> <p><a title="36 Grays Lane | Resident Concerns" href="http://www.36grayslane.co.uk/concerns.html">36grayslane</a> has been set up to highlight the actions of the Management Company representing the local residents and to gain support for the SSAFA campaign.<br>If ever there was a perfect example of the phrase NIMBY, they are it.</p> <p>It as if they don't want their neighborhood spoiled by having "the lower class" families of our service personal living in their area.<br>None of their concerns expressed (detailed at this page at <a title="36 Grays Lane | Resident Concerns" href="http://www.36grayslane.co.uk/concerns.html">36grayslane</a>&nbsp;have any merit what so ever.</p> <p>Every single resident who has signed up in protest to the <a title="The Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Families Association (SSAFA)" href="http://www.ssafa.org.uk/">SSAFA</a>&nbsp;proposal should be given a guided tour of Headley Court and spend time with the visiting families.</p> <p>Each&nbsp;of the residents who signed up, should be ashamed of their selfishness and total disrespect for the families of our service men and women who have given more than most to protect our beliefs and interests.</p> <p>The people at <a title="36 Grays Lane | Resident Concerns" href="http://www.36grayslane.co.uk/concerns.html">36grayslane</a>&nbsp;have a guestbook that you can sign to show your support.</p> <p>There is also a <a title="36 Grays Lane | Headley | SSFA" href="http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Headley/">petition</a> set up on the 10 Downing Street E-Petition site.</p> <p>The rest of the UK needs to show those residents of Grays Lane who are objecting just how pathetic their actions are.</p> <p>I wouldn't mind if they founded their objections on anything reasonable, but they are not. Laughable at best.<br>If it were a travelers camp, nightclub, sex shop or something similar to those, I could see their argument. But the truth of the matter is that the house run by SSAFA would hardly be noticeable. Their argument shows&nbsp;snobbery and contempt beyond belief.</p> <div class="wlWriterSmartContent" id="0767317B-992E-4b12-91E0-4F059A8CECA8:5b34fcfb-48a8-46ab-b0ec-552082f934d7" contenteditable="false" style="padding-right: 0px; display: inline; padding-left: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-top: 0px">IceRocket Tags: <a href="http://blogs.icerocket.com/search?q=SSAFA" rel="tag">SSAFA</a>, <a href="http://blogs.icerocket.com/search?q=36%20Grays%20Lane" rel="tag">36 Grays Lane</a>, <a href="http://blogs.icerocket.com/search?q=Headley%20Court" rel="tag">Headley Court</a></div>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>US Style Postboxes</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.yaps4u.net/mt_archives/2007/07/us_style_postboxes.html" />
<modified>2007-07-18T15:14:46Z</modified>
<issued>2007-07-18T12:14:11Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.yaps4u.net,2007://1.1160</id>
<created>2007-07-18T12:14:11Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain"><![CDATA[When we first moved to the US we were offered a 'cultural exchange' course.&nbsp; At first we thought things can't be that different, after all, they do speak "English".After living their for a few weeks you do begin to see...]]></summary>
<author>
<name>Chris Wright</name>
<url>http://www.yaps4u.net</url>
<email>blogs@yaps4u.net</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>General</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.yaps4u.net/">
<![CDATA[<p>When we first moved to the US we were offered a 'cultural exchange' course.&nbsp; At first we thought things can't be that different, after all, they do speak "English".<br>After living their for a few weeks you do begin to see differences between the way we live.&nbsp; Obviously you would expect there to be some differences, you just don't think about all the little things.  <p>Take the good old postman.&nbsp; Post is post right? Here in the UK we expect our mail to be delivered in the morning, (although gone are the days of first and second post, where if you didn't get your mail in the morning, you'd hope it would come later on that day).&nbsp; Then there are the old jokes and stories of postman being attacked by dogs as they made their way to the front door.&nbsp; In the UK, when I want to post something, I have to go to the post office or find a post box.&nbsp; There are 1000's of postboxes dotted all around the country, some dating back hundreds of years.  <p>Now they still have the humble postman in the US, but delivery and pickup is much different than here in the UK.&nbsp; I actually&nbsp;preferred the US version, (though I am not saying the&nbsp;UK doesn't do a bad&nbsp;job).&nbsp;&nbsp;  <p><a title="Locking Mailboxes" href="http://www.mailboxixchange.com" atomicselection="true"><img style="margin: 5px" alt="t_18399_01" src="http://www.yaps4u.net/images/SavingthePostman_9E65/t_18399_01.gif" align="right" border="0"></a>At&nbsp;our house in&nbsp;Texas, we had a box&nbsp;similar to the one shown which was a <a title="Locking Mailbox | Security Mailbox" href="http://www.mailboxixchange.com">Locking Mailbox</a>.  <p>Every house would have their own mailbox at the end of their drive.<br>Some places would have them attached to the house, but in our area, most were curbside. Some just had a box on a post, others had the builders leave enough bricks so that the postbox matched the house.  <p><img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; margin: 5px; border-right-width: 0px" height="91" alt="USPS Van" src="http://www.yaps4u.net/images/SavingthePostman_9E65/images.jpg" width="147" align="left" border="0">The mail vans were all right hand drive and the driver sat at a height whereby he just drove past each post box and delivered the mail without even getting out of his van.&nbsp;  <p><a title="security mailboxes" href="http://www.mailboxixchange.com" atomicselection="true"><img style="margin: 5px" height="168" alt="t_18512" src="http://www.yaps4u.net/images/SavingthePostman_9E65/t_18512.gif" width="168" align="right" border="0"></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>In apartments or gated communities, there was often a central mail collection point. </p> <p>So rather than your mail being delivered to your door, when you left for the morning and/or on your return at night, you would drive by the post collection point and pick up your post from the <a title="security mailboxes" href="http://www.mailboxixchange.com">security mailboxes</a>.</p> <p>Unless you actually wanted to buy some stamps, or drop off a large parcel or letter, when you wanted to post something, you would leave it in your post box.&nbsp; Each post box would have a flag that you would raise to let the postman know you had mail to collect.&nbsp; On his rounds, he's see the flags, drop by and pick up your mail to send.  <p>We brought our dogs back from the US with us and they just cannot get used to some stranger stuffing paper through our letter box in the front door.&nbsp; Most often they will just rip the letters out of his hand before he gets a chance to drop them. Whereas in the US, they never got near the postman because he was tucked safely away inside his van (and the dogs were usually out the back yard).  <p>It was only because I came across a web site that it got me thinking about it. <br>Click on the image below had check out the different kinds of postboxes that you can get in the US.&nbsp; All we have is a slot in the door/doorframe !!  <p><a title="US Mailboxes | Security Mailboxes | Locking Mailboxes" href="http://www.mailboxixchange.com" atomicselection="true"><img height="67" alt="mailboxixchange_logo" src="http://www.yaps4u.net/images/SavingthePostman_9E65/mailboxixchange_logo.gif" width="378" border="0"></a></p>]]>

</content>
</entry>

</feed>